Posted on 04-09-2012
Filed Under (Uncategorized) by Chloe Davies

SPA-FRANCORCHAMPS, Belgium – The 2012 Belgian G1 GP crash which caused Frenchman Romain Grosjean to be banned for a race has stoked ongoing debate about cockpit safety without providing any clearer solution to the problem.

Grosjean’s Lotus lifted into the air and skimmed across the front of championship leader Fernando Alonso’s Ferrari in the first corner pile-up, wrecking his car but fortunately missing the Spaniard’s head.

The incident, blamed squarely on Grosjean’s aggressive driving, was a heart-stopping moment for Ferrari fans and senior team members watching from the pits wall as Alonso took his time getting out of the cockpit amid radio silence.


Ferrari team boss Stefano Domenicali said: “We were lucky because nothing hit Fernando on the head.”

He told reporters this in a discussion that also touched on the need for inexperienced young drivers to be punished heavily for failings in the junior categories to ensure they arrive in F1with more awareness. Ferrari technical head Pat Fry said: “It was a very risky situation and seeing one car fly over his, a few centimetres from his helmet, left us with our hearts in our mouths for a few tenths of a second.”

Protecting the driver’s head in such incidents with flying cars and debris has long been a concern for F1, a sport in which the dangers are evident and there is a constant push to improve safety in all areas.

No driver has been killed since Brazilian triple champion Ayrton Senna at Imola in 1994 but everyone in F1 knows there is a constant risk of a freak accident. Brazilian Felipe Massa’s near-fatal head injury at the 2009 Hungarian GP, when another car’s suspension part hit his helmet, was a reminder of that.


The governing International Automobile Federation has done tests with jet-fighter style closed cockpits and forward roll hoops, a metal structure placed right in front of the driver to guard against a frontal blow to the helmet, but all carry other risks.

“We are working with the Federation to try to work on the right system of protection with what we have tested or are working on there are also some problems that you may have,” said Domenicali.

“We need to be very careful on all these devices. We are still working with the federation to find a possible solution… we are working very hard.”

McLaren team principal Martin Whitmarsh agreed there was a need for some sort of added protection but closed cockpits were not the solution.

“I think people underestimate what a cockpit would have to be and how cockpits can make a situation worse,” Whitmarsh said. “You can put this glass bubble over the drivers but you can’t assume that they are thereafter safe.”

Whitmarsh pointed to the considerable amount of research carried out in aviation to counter the effect of bird strikes on aircraft and how difficult it had been to protect a pilot while allowing undistorted visibility.

In the case of motor racing there were the added problems of impeding sight lines, cars overturning or suffering electrical fires with cockpits filling up with smoke.

Comments Off on F1 cockpit safety scrutinised   
  • Payment Protection Facility

    Total Consumer Protection for out of town purchases, Read More.

  • administration